If a provision of the Davis-Stirling Act requires general delivery or general notice the document shall be provided by one or more of the methods set forth in Civil Code section 4045.
The Good Samaritan Law traditionally protects those individuals who attempt to render aid in an emergency from liability associated with rescues gone awry. Most often, associations encounter this law when dealing with the decision of whether to purchase an automatic or semi-automatic defibrillator. Currently, the law is vague on whether associations which have an automatic or semi-automatic external defibrillator enjoy this protection. Contact your attorney to discuss this topic.
A term of no fixed meaning generally construed in associations to refer to compliance with governing documents. Thus an owner who is in default on payment of assessments, or in violation of the governing documents, may be said to be “not in good standing.” However, because the term is not defined by statute, a clear definition within the governing documents is advisable. A finding that an owner is “not in good standing” may require prior notice and a hearing.
The CC&Rs and other documents, such as bylaws, operating rules, articles of incorporation, or articles of association, which govern the operation of the common interest development. (Civ. Code §4150)
Refers to a provision within an amended governing document allowing an existing use or status existing to survive the adoption of a prohibition or restriction on such use or status. For example, a rental restriction might “grandfather in” existing rentals, or a pet restriction might “grandfather in” existing pets whose number or weight would exceed the amended provision.
Gross negligence is the lack of any care or an extreme departure from what a reasonably careful person would do in the same situation to prevent harm to oneself or to others. A person can be grossly negligent by acting or failing to act. California courts have recognized gross negligence as either a “want of even scant care” or “an extreme departure from the ordinary standard of conduct.” (City of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 747, 754.)
The Community Care Facilities Act (Health & Saf. Code §§1500-1567.8) provides that a community care facility serving six or fewer persons is a both a residential and single-family use of property. Such residential facilities are family home or group care facilities providing 24-hour nonmedical care to persons in need of services essential to sustain daily living activities or protection of the person. Examples include, but are not limited to, group care homes for the elderly and the disabled. Similarly, alcohol or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities serving six or fewer persons are also considered a residential use of property. (Heath & Saf. Code §§11834.20–11834.25) Public policy favors establishment of group homes and community associations may not prohibit otherwise lawful group homes through restrictions.
A person hired to provide various types of services, such as admittance to a gated community, inspection of premises, enforcement of parking or traffic rules. California regulates such services, both for guards providing security services as employees of the association, and for persons providing such services as employees of a vendor hired by the association to render such services. See Business & Professions Code §§7574 et seq. (proprietary security services) and 7580 (private security services).
Assistance dogs trained to guide the blind and visually impaired. Beginning on March 15, 2011, only dogs are recognized as service animals under titles II and III of the ADA. (There are some narrow situations wherein a miniature horse may also be considered a “service animal.”) Further, under the ADA, such animals must be individually trained for the work at hand. Under the FHA and California law, “service animals” other than trained guide dogs may be permitted as a reasonable accommodation for disability, depending on the particular needs of a disabled applicant
All games of chance organized for charitable purposes are subject to the state’s gambling laws. There is an exception to the general constitutional prohibition against lotteries (which includes raffles). In California, certain “eligible organizations,” as defined by the Penal Code, may conduct raffles to raise funds for beneficial or charitable purposes if certain conditions are met. “Eligible organizations,” such as private, nonprofit organizations, must be tax-exempt and have been qualified to do business in California for at least a year prior to the raffle.
According to the Attorney General, the three elements of a lottery are: (1) a prize, (2) distributed by chance, and (3) something of value given for a chance to win. To comply with the Penal Code, at least 90% of the gross receipts from the raffle must go directly to beneficial or charitable purposes in California. Any person that receives compensation must be an employee of the eligible organization and not receive proceeds that should be dedicated to the charitable purposes. See Penal Code section 320.5(d). Use of the internet for raffle sales is prohibited, however, the organization’s website may announce the raffle. No gaming machine, apparatus or device, may be used in conducting the raffle. No entity may have or hold a financial interest in the raffle other than the organization conducting the raffle or any eligible organization which receives funds from the raffle. The raffle or selling of tickets may not be located within an operating racetrack enclosure, satellite wagering facility or gambling establishment.
An organization may not conduct a raffle unless it completes the annual “Application for Registration” form and files an annual “Nonprofit Raffle Report” with the Department of Justice. See Penal Code section 320.5(h)(6). Certain organizations are exempt from the registration requirements.